A note to the reader
This issue draws from listed companies, households, experiments and other adjacent settings. It is not a collection of 100 studies directly sampling family offices. Use the evidence to sharpen questions; check each paper’s population, methods and limitations before applying it. Each source has its own passage agent. Original findings remain distinct from the editorial practice articles elsewhere in the journal.
97–100 of 100 articles
97Systemic risk & interconnected capital · Research source
Lupe S. H. Chan; Amanda M. Y. Chu; Mike K. P. So
PLOS ONE · 2023-01-20 · CC BY 4.0
Adjacent financial-network evidence for counterparty concentration, manager-overlap and market stress analysis; model-based or historical findings are not a forecast of the family’s losses.
98Systemic risk & interconnected capital · Research source
Ana Iglesias-Casal; María-Celia López-Penabad; Carmen López-Andión; José Manuel Maside-Sanfiz
PLoS ONE · 2020-02-03 · CC BY 4.0
Adjacent financial-network evidence for counterparty concentration, manager-overlap and market stress analysis; model-based or historical findings are not a forecast of the family’s losses.
99Systemic risk & interconnected capital · Research source
Danilo Delpini; Stefano Battiston; Guido Caldarelli; Massimo Riccaboni
PLoS ONE · 2019-05-23 · CC BY 4.0
Adjacent financial-network evidence for counterparty concentration, manager-overlap and market stress analysis; model-based or historical findings are not a forecast of the family’s losses.
100Systemic risk & interconnected capital · Research source
Yongli Li; Guanghe Liu; Paolo Pin
PLoS ONE · 2018-07-12 · CC BY 4.0
Adjacent financial-network evidence for counterparty concentration, manager-overlap and market stress analysis; model-based or historical findings are not a forecast of the family’s losses.