Research reading 033 / Simulator / 2023

Extended reality (xR) flight simulators as an adjunct to traditional flight training methods: a scoping review

Source authors: Glen Ross; Andrew Gilbey

Originally published in CEAS Aeronautical Journal · 2023

An annotated reading guide. The full source article is available through the original publication link above.

Paper AgentAsk this paper.Explore evidence, limits & sources

Journal reading guide + source metadata

Find passages you can follow back to their source. This reading companion searches this record; it does not invent answers or provide an operational flight briefing.

Source coverage & reuse

Extended reality (xR) flight simulators as an adjunct to traditional flight training methods: a scoping review
Glen Ross; Andrew Gilbey

The guide and its evidence limits are journal annotations, not quotations from the original researchers. The complete original paper is not currently in this agent’s searchable context.

Open original source ↗ · CC BY 4.0

S1 Training transfer and adoption

Why read this for flight training?

Maps XR as an adjunct to established flight training. Helps schools distinguish promising applications from questions still requiring research.

How to interpret the evidence

A scoping review maps a field; it does not establish a pooled estimate of effectiveness.

Screening basis: Abstract screened. This annotation identifies relevance and limits; it does not replace appraisal of the original methods and findings.

Cite the original article

Glen Ross; Andrew Gilbey (2023). Extended reality (xR) flight simulators as an adjunct to traditional flight training methods: a scoping review. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 14(4), 799-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-023-00688-5

Publication record

The original paper retains its published authors, venue and DOI. This journal’s reading guide was prepared with AI assistance under the editorial direction of Dr. Freedom Cheteni. The source authors are not credited as authors of this annotation. No new peer review or DOI is claimed for the guide.

Continue this chapter