Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal
Originally published 2024-03-25 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359164 ↗
AI / system type
Organizational AI acceptance and workplace use
Workplace evidenceExamines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
The AI connection
System or context examined: Organizational AI acceptance and workplace use. The source-specific system and study design determine what can be inferred.
Why this reading matters
The reading brings competitive climates and leaders’ understanding of power into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers three-wave field study and factorial experiment evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.
Workplace evidence
Work, care and the whole person.
The workplace lens is competitive climates and leaders’ understanding of power. Source setting or population: 237 UK employees in the field study and 150 employee participants in an experiment. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.
Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
Editorial reading guide · Trust
Can responsible leadership make AI adoption feel less like a race?
This three-wave field study and factorial experiment examines competitive climates and leaders’ understanding of power. Its TRICK home is Trust, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.
Study context
237 UK employees in the field study and 150 employee participants in an experiment
Age / stage: Working adults; mean ages 38.28 and 37.50 in the two studies
Read with three questions
- Can responsible leadership make AI adoption feel less like a race?
- What do this study’s design and population — 237 UK employees in the field study and 150 employee participants in an experiment — allow you to infer about another workplace?
- When considering competitive climates and leaders’ understanding of power, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?
Keep the limits in view
Experimental scenarios and field associations answer different questions; neither establishes household benefits of AI use.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Kyriaki Fousiani; Georgios Michelakis; Pieter A Minnigh; Kiki M M De Jonge (2024). Competitive organizational climate and artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance: the moderating role of leaders’ power construal Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359164
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.