Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 2 · Licensed source edition
Psychometric evaluation of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire in Polish mothers
Originally published 2024-04-17 · PLOS ONE
PLOS · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0299427 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Trust
How well does a translated questionnaire capture the way a parent thinks about a young child's feelings?
The authors examine instrument properties in a community sample, before making claims about relationships between reflective parenting and other outcomes.
Who was studied?
Polish mothers reporting on their capacity to reflect on their child's mental states
Age / stage: Children ages 0–5
Read with three questions
- How well does a translated questionnaire capture the way a parent thinks about a young child's feelings?
- What evidence supports the reliability and validity of the measure for these particular respondents?
- Which features of the study population (polish mothers reporting on their capacity to reflect on their child's mental states) would matter when applying the findings in another setting?
Keep the limits in view
The validation sample comprised Polish mothers with children up to age five. Psychometric performance in another language, age range or caregiver group needs separate study.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Anna Kamza; Patrick Luyten; Konrad Piotrowski (2024). Psychometric evaluation of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire in Polish mothers PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299427
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.