← Trust · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 2 · Licensed source edition

Two Babies, Two Bonds: Challenges in Attachment Relationships in Twins

Originally published 2024-12-26 · Cureus
Cureus Inc. · DOI 10.7759/cureus.76422 ↗

TrustClinical case and narrative reviewCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

Editorial reading guide · Trust

How can a caregiver recognize each twin's signals as individual?

A clinical illustration and narrative literature review explore why relationships with two children of the same age may develop differently.

Who was studied?

A twin case considered alongside published work on infant-caregiver relationships

Age / stage: Infancy and toddlerhood

Read with three questions

  1. How can a caregiver recognize each twin's signals as individual?
  2. Which inclusion criteria and differences among the original studies matter for the authors’ conclusions?
  3. Which features of the study population (a twin case considered alongside published work on infant-caregiver relationships) would matter when applying the findings in another setting?

Keep the limits in view

The discussion combines a clinical case with a nonsystematic review. It can illustrate how twins' relationships may differ, but cannot estimate how common any attachment pattern is.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Daniela Simões; Tiago Soares; Graça Fernandes (2024). Two Babies, Two Bonds: Challenges in Attachment Relationships in Twins Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76422

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.