Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Scale Development and Its Effect on Job Performance
Originally published 2025-06-13 · Behavioral Sciences
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) · DOI 10.3390/bs15060811 ↗
AI / system type
Generative AI literacy: technical competence, prompting, evaluation, application and ethics
Workplace evidenceExamines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
The AI connection
System or context examined: Generative AI literacy: technical competence, prompting, evaluation, application and ethics. The source-specific system and study design determine what can be inferred.
Why this reading matters
The reading brings generative AI literacy and creative self-efficacy into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers scale-development and empirical validation study evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.
Workplace evidence
Work, care and the whole person.
The workplace lens is generative AI literacy and creative self-efficacy. Source setting or population: Workplace participants used to develop a five-dimensional generative AI literacy measure. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.
Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.
Editorial reading guide · Independence
What should learning to work with AI include beyond writing a good prompt?
This scale-development and empirical validation study examines generative AI literacy and creative self-efficacy. Its TRICK home is Independence, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.
Study context
Workplace participants used to develop a five-dimensional generative AI literacy measure
Age / stage: Adult workplace context; no child age range inferred
Read with three questions
- What should learning to work with AI include beyond writing a good prompt?
- What do this study’s design and population — Workplace participants used to develop a five-dimensional generative AI literacy measure — allow you to infer about another workplace?
- When considering generative AI literacy and creative self-efficacy, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?
Keep the limits in view
A validated measure and performance associations do not establish that a particular training course improves jobs or family wellbeing.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Xin Liu; Longxin Zhang; Xiaochong Wei (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Scale Development and Its Effect on Job Performance Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060811
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.