← Independence · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition

The double-edged sword effect of algorithmic management on work engagement of platform workers: the roles of appraisals and resources

Originally published 2025-06-25 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522088 ↗

IndependenceDelivery-worker questionnaire studyCC BY (version not stated)
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

AI / system type

Algorithmic management of food-delivery work

Workplace evidence

Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.

The AI connection

System or context examined: Algorithmic management of food-delivery work. Algorithmic management/control is not assumed to be machine learning or generative AI.

Why this reading matters

The reading brings challenge and threat appraisals under delivery-platform management into a concrete discussion of humane work during technological change. It offers delivery-worker questionnaire study evidence or analysis, not a promise of organizational or family benefit.

Workplace evidence

Work, care and the whole person.

The workplace lens is challenge and threat appraisals under delivery-platform management. Source setting or population: 292 delivery workers on two major food-delivery platforms in China. Parenting and child-development outcomes are not inferred from the workplace evidence.

Examines workers, organizations or AI at work. Participants are not necessarily parents; family benefits are not established by this evidence alone.

Editorial reading guide · Independence

How can I tell whether an algorithmic work demand is an opportunity or a threat?

This delivery-worker questionnaire study examines challenge and threat appraisals under delivery-platform management. Its TRICK home is Independence, an editorial reading path rather than a claim that the paper tests the full framework.

Study context

292 delivery workers on two major food-delivery platforms in China

Age / stage: Adult workplace context; no child age range inferred

Read with three questions

  1. How can I tell whether an algorithmic work demand is an opportunity or a threat?
  2. What do this study’s design and population — 292 delivery workers on two major food-delivery platforms in China — allow you to infer about another workplace?
  3. When considering challenge and threat appraisals under delivery-platform management, which decisions would need employee input before applying this reading to a working family’s circumstances?

Keep the limits in view

Platform-specific perceptions and statistical mediation do not establish causal effects or show that control is desirable for all workers.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Feifei Li; Xiaohui Zhan; Yun Liu (2025). The double-edged sword effect of algorithmic management on work engagement of platform workers: the roles of appraisals and resources Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522088

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.