Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 5 · Licensed source edition
Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot
Originally published 2025-08-15 · Frontiers in Oral Health
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/froh.2025.1652422 ↗
AI / system type
Generative AI/LLM expert-rated answer benchmark
Family implicationsDesign, ethics, stakeholder or technical evidence with child/family implications; household benefits are not assumed.
The AI connection
ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot generated answers to parent-oriented pediatric dental questions.
Why this reading matters
Helps parents read comparative quality claims without treating a model ranking as a substitute for examination or personalized care.
Editorial reading guide · Trust
What evidence would make an AI dental answer useful for our actual decision?
ChatGPT received higher ratings than Gemini and Copilot across the study’s five content dimensions. The result concerns selected answer quality, while the study explicitly leaves how caregivers interpret and use advice untested.
Study context
Pediatric dental experts assessed anonymized answers to 30 questions derived from clinic concerns and public family-information sources.
Age / stage: Pediatric dental concerns; no enrolled parent or child users
Read with three questions
- Which features did the expert rubric reward?
- How might excluded case-specific questions have made the test easier?
- What parent behavior or safety outcomes were never measured?
Keep the limits in view
The 30-question instrument lacked formal psychometric validation and omitted overly specific cases. Outputs vary with updates and prompts; the study neither measured caregiver decisions nor established why one model performed better.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Deepika Kapoor; Deepanshu Garg; Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla (2025). Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot Frontiers in Oral Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1652422
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.