Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 4 · Licensed source edition
Does the ‘right to request’ flexible work policy influence men’s and women’s uptake of flexible working and well-being: findings from the UK Household Longitudinal Study
Originally published 2025-09-15 · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
BMJ · DOI 10.1136/jech-2025-224166 ↗
Working-family evidence
Work, care and the whole person.
Relevant to decisions about evaluating who benefits from a flexibility-request process; the original evidence concerns united Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study participants around the 2014 flexible-work policy extension.
Directly examines work and family life, parenting, caregiving or employment policies for families.
Editorial reading guide · Independence
Does the ability to request flexibility translate into an option people can use?
This reading brings the historical right-to-request reform, uptake of flexibility and unequal changes in wellbeing into the independence pathway. The household-panel policy analysis using difference-in-differences offers a specific workplace lens on how employment and family life meet.
Study context
United Kingdom Household Longitudinal Study participants around the 2014 flexible-work policy extension
Age / stage: Working adults; results compared by gender
Read with three questions
- How did the researchers define and assess eligibility, uptake and forms of flexible work?
- What does the study design allow us to conclude about difference-in-differences assumptions and gender-specific estimates?
- What would need to be checked before adopting evaluating who benefits from a flexibility-request process?
Keep the limits in view
This evaluates a historical UK reform rather than giving current legal advice; causal interpretation depends on design assumptions and not all flexible-work forms increased.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Baowen Xue; Heejung Chung; Ran Gu; Anne McMunn (2025). Does the ‘right to request’ flexible work policy influence men’s and women’s uptake of flexible working and well-being: findings from the UK Household Longitudinal Study Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224166
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-05. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.