Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 3 · Licensed source edition
Parenting interventions for parents of children with type 1 diabetes—a systematic review
Originally published 2025-12-01 · Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Oxford University Press · DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf078 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Respect
How does this research distinguish supporting a child’s care from taking over every conversation?
The review addresses supportive parenting during repeated health-related tasks that can become sources of tension.
Who was studied?
Families included in an evidence review of pediatric diabetes parenting interventions.
Age / stage: Children with type 1 diabetes
Read with three questions
- Which interventions focused on parenting and which outcomes concerned diabetes management?
- How did the review decide which studies or instruments to include?
- How does this research distinguish supporting a child’s care from taking over every conversation?
Keep the limits in view
The scope depends on the search strategy, eligible sources and differences between their measures. The review does not test a specific household practice.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Mandy Jansen; Paul G Voorhoeve; Lianne Wiltink; Judith B Prins; Giesje Nefs (2025). Parenting interventions for parents of children with type 1 diabetes—a systematic review Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf078
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.