← Trust · 20 readings

Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 5 · Licensed source edition

Evaluation of parents’ attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in dental practice: a cross-sectional survey

Originally published 2026-07-20 · BMC Oral Health
BMC · DOI 10.1186/s12903-026-09320-4 ↗

TrustCross-sectional parent surveyCC BY 4.0
Ask this paper · Find source passages →

AI / system type

General dental AI perceptions; no specific model evaluated

Direct parenting evidence

Directly addresses parents or caregiving, including parent studies, syntheses and audits of parenting advice.

The AI connection

The study measures parent attitudes toward AI use and physician–AI collaboration in pediatric dental practice.

Why this reading matters

Useful for discussing the gap between willingness to accept dental AI and evidence that a family understands its risks.

Editorial reading guide · Trust

What would make AI assistance at the dentist worthy of our confidence?

Parents commonly anticipated time savings and favorable clinician–AI collaboration. Education and gender differences had small effects, and the error/security subscale was weak, cautioning against turning positive attitudes into evidence of informed reliance.

Study context

Three hundred eighty-six parents attending one Turkish university dental school completed a 23-item survey; most had university education.

Age / stage: Pediatric dental patients; exact child ages not specified

Read with three questions

  1. Which advantages were anticipated rather than demonstrated?
  2. How large were the reported demographic differences?
  3. What does the weak reliability of the error/security scale mean for interpreting reassurance?

Keep the limits in view

The online survey excluded parents with low digital literacy and used a three-point response scale at one center. The errors/security subscale had low internal consistency (alpha 0.432), and no clinical or family outcomes were measured.

The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.

Opening the verified paper and agent…

Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.

Open the repository record

Attribution & reuse

Follow the original.

Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.

Esra Hato; Büşra Çelik Kalaağası; Merve Erkmen Almaz; Volkan Arıkan (2026). Evaluation of parents’ attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in dental practice: a cross-sectional survey BMC Oral Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09320-4

Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.