Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 4 · Licensed source edition
Preliminary evaluation of the BeH20 co-parenting program using a multiple baseline experimental design
Originally published 2026-07-06 · Family court review
Wiley · DOI 10.1111/fcre.70085 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Collaboration
How could we tell whether a change in how we coordinate lasts beyond a program session?
A community program is evaluated both after completion and across repeated observations of coparenting. The two designs answer different questions about how adults manage conflict.
Who was studied?
Divorced or separated parents experiencing substantial interparental conflict; 102 completed the survey and 11 supplied repeated daily reports.
Age / stage: Children of separated parents
Read with three questions
- What does the daily record add to parents' end-of-program impressions?
- Did outcomes shift at the point when each participant began the intervention?
- How might the division of care in a different household affect how the findings apply?
Keep the limits in view
Repeated observations strengthen the single-case component, while a post-program survey measures retrospective perceptions. Neither sample establishes average effects in all separated families.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Rebecca Hoppe; Disha Kotecha; Karey L O’Hara; Trina Nudson (2026). Preliminary evaluation of the BeH20 co-parenting program using a multiple baseline experimental design Family court review. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.70085
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.