Parenting Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 1 · Licensed source edition
The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation
Originally published 2017-05-04 · PLoS ONE
PLOS · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0176218 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Trust
Can a short parent questionnaire capture the uncertainty involved in understanding a child's mind?
The instrument-development studies clarify the components of parental reflective functioning and the limits of self-report.
Who was studied?
Parents participating in studies of a questionnaire about understanding a child's mental states
Age / stage: Parents of dependent children
Read with three questions
- Can a short parent questionnaire capture the uncertainty involved in understanding a child's mind?
- What evidence supports the reliability and validity of the measure for these particular respondents?
- Which features of the study population (parents participating in studies of a questionnaire about understanding a child's mental states) would matter when applying the findings in another setting?
Keep the limits in view
An early validation of a parent questionnaire establishes how its items performed in the studied samples. It cannot establish a family's attachment classification from a parent's score alone.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Patrick Luyten; Linda C. Mayes; Liesbet Nijssens; Peter Fonagy (2017). The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176218
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.