Parenting Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 1 · Licensed source edition
Parental autonomy support and future-oriented coping among high school students: Serial mediation of future time perspective and meaning in life
Originally published 2022-08-03 · Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895003 ↗
Editorial reading guide · Independence
How can I talk about future plans while letting my teenager develop their own reasons?
This study examines supported self-direction in relation to thinking ahead and making meaning. It offers questions for discussing future plans without presuming a causal effect.
Who was studied?
707 students from one high school in Guizhou, China.
Age / stage: 15–18 years
Read with three questions
- How was future-oriented coping defined?
- What associations involved future time perspective and meaning in life?
- What alternative causal directions could a longitudinal study examine?
Keep the limits in view
A single-school, cross-sectional questionnaire study cannot establish causal order or an effective parenting intervention.
The text below is the original article’s licensed repository edition. Its wording is not rewritten. Use the Paper Agent beside the text to locate evidence; open the source for figures, tables and complete context.
Opening the verified paper and agent…
Checking the article identity, license record, and saved source text.
Open the repository recordAttribution & reuse
Follow the original.
Original authorship, publication date, journal and DOI are preserved. This issue’s TRICK placement and reading questions are editorial additions, not claims made by the original authors.
Lianping Zeng; Xia Peng; Xiaoye Zeng; Hui Wang; Shifei Xiao; Yan Chen (2022). Parental autonomy support and future-oriented coping among high school students: Serial mediation of future time perspective and meaning in life Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895003
Permissions checked against the saved article notice; repository publication notices screened 2026-11-04. This is not a new peer-review decision. The source authors and publishers are not represented as endorsing this issue.