Original publication
Original source files retain their contents, figures, dates and mastheads. Source copies are preserved without alteration; large originals use the Press preservation service.
Research-informed curriculum report · Preserved source identity
Jeff Zwiers; Jack Dieckmann; Sara Rutherford-Quach; Vinci Daro; Renae Skarin; Steven Weiss; James Malamut
Understanding Language / Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity, Stanford Graduate School of Education · Version 2.0 · 2017-02-28 (source report date)
Original source files retain their contents, figures, dates and mastheads. Source copies are preserved without alteration; large originals use the Press preservation service.
Zwiers, J., Dieckmann, J., Rutherford-Quach, S., Daro, V., Skarin, R., Weiss, S., & Malamut, J. (2017). Principles for the Design of Mathematics Curricula: Promoting Language and Content Development. Understanding Language / SCALE, Stanford University. Version 2.0, February 28, 2017.
Source version: 2.0. Local hosting record: 2026-10-16. Source institution report; peer-review status not established.
Jeff Zwiers · author
Jack Dieckmann · author
Sara Rutherford-Quach · author
Vinci Daro · author
Renae Skarin · author
Steven Weiss · author
James Malamut · author
source report date · source-file · 2017-02-28
An independently curated Research University Press collection of Stanford-hosted sources. This collection does not assert Stanford University ownership, sponsorship, endorsement or transfer of source publishing authority.
CC BY 4.0 · Checked 2026-10-16
Version-specific source metadata and rights ↗This work, created by Understanding Language/Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity at Stanford University, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 2017.
No DOI supplied in the source citation. Registry and responsible-publisher checks are required before any first registration. Hosting and adding an agent do not make this a new original article or establish authority to register a replacement DOI.
not established; source file is not a retraction registry. This source check is not a new peer review or an endorsement of the findings.