Gender stereotypes in equity crowdfunding: the effect of gender bias on the interpretation of quality signals

Simon Kleinert; Kazem Mochkabadi

The Journal of Technology Transfer · 2021-10-11 · Issue: 2022/12
Empirical observational study · Version of record · CC BY 4.0 · 9,339 words

Read article Ask paper agent Open solutions companion →

Ask this paper

Full manuscript text
Source-linked passage retrieval

Paper Agent

Agent platform credit

Dr. Freedom Cheteni · Editor in Chief

Research University Journal · JournalOS conception and editorial stewardship

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3507-0094

This ORCID identifies the human contributor to the agent platform. Source-paper authors retain their own authorship and identifiers.

Manuscript & source record

Title: Gender stereotypes in equity crowdfunding: the effect of gender bias on the interpretation of quality signals
Human authorship: Simon Kleinert; Kazem Mochkabadi
Source: Complete manuscript edition 2026-10-21
Editorial record: Attributed Creative Commons source edition. Original publication and authorship remain with the source. Hosting is not a new peer-review decision.

Searches this article’s preserved text and returns exact passages. The source paper and its solutions companion have separate records and agents.

Attribution, rights & verification

Original authors / creators: Simon Kleinert; Kazem Mochkabadi
Original publication: The Journal of Technology Transfer · Springer Nature · 2021-10-11 · Issue date 2022/12
Source & version: Authoritative source ↗ · Version of record
doi:10.1007/s10961-021-09892-z
License & retained notices: CC BY 4.0
© 2021 The Author(s). Original authorship and source retained.
Article-specific license evidence ↗
Exact license notice
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Edition changes: Licensed text reading edition. Source headings, paragraphs and references are preserved; whitespace, typography and layout are normalized. Figures and separately licensed third-party images are not reproduced. Consult the linked original for tables, figures, equations, supplementary material and definitive pagination. This is a republication of existing scholarship, not a new original research claim.
Evidence limits: Observational evidence from 263 technology crowdfunding campaigns concerns how signals relate to funding. It does not establish an inherent difference in founder capability or validate a calibration intervention for family offices.
Retraction / correction check: Publisher article page and DOI-specific web search inspected on 21 October 2026; no retraction or expression-of-concern notice identified. This is a limited public-source screen, not an exhaustive registry certification.
Preserved record: Rights and full text checked 2026-10-21. Included in this volume on 2026-10-21. Original source dates remain unchanged.
Download the preserved source
SHA-256 (retrieved artifact): e5b7835a82c748a1014f3e9256936b4360242319835e7d5dfbbfd0ff61cf6bcf
SHA-256 (preserved text edition): 0f2aa9b153f0eac407424a3ec94e441becb48f042ba20b1a2644949dc646ac18