Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods
Inspect the evidence
Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.
Oakland Unified · D02
Unified School District. Document search status: located.
- AI disclosure · Express provision
- Detector limits · Reviewed text silent
- Evidentiary standard · Express provision
- Student response · Express provision
- Formal appeal · Reviewed text silent
Documents reviewed
- AI in School – A Guide for Families (Spanish) · Slides headed “Cosas para recordar al utilizar la IA en la escuela” and “¿Cuáles son las políticas con respecto a la IA?”. Drive modification 2025-02-28; no adoption date stated. AI disclosure, Detector limits, Evidentiary standard, Student response, Formal appeal.
- Teacher Central – OUSD AI Guidance · OUSD AI Guidance > AI in School – A Guide for Teachers and A Guide for Families. undated. Screening context.
- Oakland Board of Education file 25-3060 · Status and Final Action. 2026-02-11. Screening context.
- OUSD AI in School – A Guide for Teachers · Slide 9, guidance when AI authorship is suspected, private teacher-student conversation and student familiarity with the assignment. undated district-linked teacher guidance. Evidentiary standard, Student response.
District table
2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.
Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.
Version and review history
The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.
All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.