When a school questions authorship

Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods

Inspect the evidence

Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.

Corona-Norco Unified · D08

Unified School District. Document search status: located.

  • AI disclosure · Ambiguous or conflicting
  • Detector limits · Reviewed text silent
  • Evidentiary standard · Reviewed text silent
  • Student response · Reviewed text silent
  • Formal appeal · Reviewed text silent

Documents reviewed

  1. Artificial Intelligence · Introduction and AI Across the District, including Operational Purpose and Community & Parents panels. Undated. AI disclosure, Detector limits, Evidentiary standard, Student response, Formal appeal.
  2. AI Literacy · CNUSD AI Literacy Definition and school/community aims. Undated. AI disclosure.
  3. CNUSD IB Policies (program context) · Academic honesty for the IB PYP, MYP and DP; student Citation and Attribution section. Revised June 2024. Screening context.
  4. Parent Student Handbook, Supplemental · 2026–27 supplemental handbook, table of contents and academic-honesty search. 2026–27. Evidentiary standard, Student response, Formal appeal.

District table

2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.

Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.

Version and review history

The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.

All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.