Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods
Inspect the evidence
Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.
Santa Cruz City High · D26
High School District. Document search status: located.
- AI disclosure · Express provision
- Detector limits · Reviewed text silent
- Evidentiary standard · Reviewed text silent
- Student response · Reviewed text silent
- Formal appeal · Reviewed text silent
Documents reviewed
- SCCS Student Expectations: Using Artificial Intelligence for Learning · Citations and Academic Honesty bullets; student pledge (English section), document indices 777–1266 and 2280–2577. May 2024 revision. AI disclosure, Detector limits, Evidentiary standard, Student response, Formal appeal.
- SCCS Employee AI Expectations · Purpose, Scope and Ethical Use. July 2024. Screening context.
- Santa Cruz City Schools AI in School · Links to student and staff guidelines. undated. Screening context.
- SCCS Learning Community Behavioral Expectations · Philosophy and Accountability for Learning Community Expectations. 2024-05-08 in title. Screening context.
District table
2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.
Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.
Version and review history
The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.
All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.