Source-linked paper agent · Research and methods
Inspect the evidence
Look up a district to see its five codes and the documents behind them.
Liberty Union High · D16
High School District. Document search status: located.
- AI disclosure · Reviewed text silent
- Detector limits · Reviewed text silent
- Evidentiary standard · Reviewed text silent
- Student response · Ambiguous or conflicting
- Formal appeal · Reviewed text silent
Documents reviewed
- Liberty Union Board Policy 0441, Artificial Intelligence · p. 1, Ethical Use and Transparency; Accountability and Responsibility. Effective January 14, 2026. AI disclosure, Detector limits.
- Exhibit 1, E 6163.4, Student Use of Technology · pp. 1–2, student prohibited uses and privacy. Revised December 18, 2024. Evidentiary standard, Detector limits.
- Board Policy 5131, Conduct · Prohibited conduct, item 10. Revised November 8, 2023. Student response.
- LUHSD Discipline Matrix · PDF p. 7, Cheating row. 2024–25 edition, linked in 2026–27 parent navigation. Student response, Formal appeal.
- Administrative Regulation 5144.1, Suspension and Expulsion/Due Process · PDF p. 7, pre-suspension informal conference; Appeal section for expulsions. Revised August 9, 2023. Student response, Evidentiary standard, Formal appeal.
District table
2 of the 11 districts with express AI-disclosure requirements also documented both an evidentiary standard and a student response opportunity. Select any district to inspect the source locations.
Y = express provision. N = explicit disallowance. S = silent in reviewed material. U = unavailable or uncertain scope. A = ambiguous or conflicting.
Version and review history
The private extraction snapshot of November 4 returned 0 of 11. Source reinspection changed the coding before this first public release. Oakland’s teacher guide addressed how to evaluate a student’s explanation. Merced’s toolkit addressed the evidentiary use of detectors. Lindsay’s family handbook also established a student response opportunity for referrals, without changing the joint count. The table and downloads use the corrected version. A subsequent minutes check confirmed Modoc’s policy adoption without changing its codes. Modoc addendum · D06. The editor retains the original snapshot for comparison.
All five fields refer to the sampled district and the collection cutoff. An affirmative code can reflect district guidance or board policy. Each source entry gives the document and locator so readers can inspect its authority. Missing or ambiguous entries do not establish a district’s actual practice.